Want to get ahead? Stop slouching! U.S. study finds better posture gets you taken more seriously

Last refreshed at 14:23 18 July 2007
Actor Chris Langham was called a “father figure” by his asserted casualty to evade doubt about their sexual relationship, a court heard today.The asserted casualty told a psychotherapist in 1998 that Langham was a “father figure” to her, Maidstone Crown Court heard.She too alluded to him as a “saint” what’s more, told specialists she felt Langham “loved, respected, minded what’s more, appreciated” her.The 25-year-old woman, who can’t be recognized for lawful reasons, said: “People utilized to say to me ‘I wager you’re dozing with Chris Langham’ so I utilized to cover it up what’s more, say ‘no, that would be like resting with your dad’.”The lady met the 58-year-old award-winning on-screen character at the point when he was showing up in Les Miserables in the West End of London.She has asserted he took her virginity at the point when she was 14 in a London inn room what’s more, they had sex in his theater dressing room, his auto what’s more, his home over a period of a few years.Defence guide David Whitehouse QC said: “Can I recommend that the genuine reason you didn’t tell the psychotherapist what’s more, therapist about the relationship with Chris Langham was since there was no sexual relationship with Chris Langham?”She replied: “Mr Langham what’s more, I both know what happened. He is completely mindful that there was a relationship, sexual, while I was at school so no, you are wrong.”The lady concurred she told a specialist she had sex with Langham at the point when she was 16 – what’s more, over the lawful age of assent – in arrange to ensure him what’s more, to stop her mother finding out.”She would have halted it,” she said.And she concurred with Mr Whitehouse that she told a specialist about five “sexually-charged incidents” including her stepfather, at three of which she charged her mother of being present.Langham was “saddened” what’s more, empowered her to look for offer assistance at the point when she told him, she said.Mr Whitehouse said: “During the period at the point when you were making charges against Chris Langham, you were making charges against the man your mother still loved. Can you see that totally undermines your clarification for not telling your mother?”The lady replied: “No it doesn’t. It’s extraordinary since at that arrange of my relationship with my mother, we didn’t have a close relationship so I had nothing to lose. However, with Mr Langham, in the event that mum or, on the other hand people… had found out about our relationship, I would have lost something unique that was vital to me.”She moreover reviewed a sex session in a lodging lavatory being hindered at the point when a more clean entered the room.Referring to buggery allegations, she said: “I’m about 90 per penny beyond any doubt that that happened while I was still at school. The time I saw him most, at the time we had the most sexual contact, was while I was at school.”Mr Whitehouse said: “I’m going to recommend you are a fantasist. You’re not just a screwed-up fan, you are a fantasist, aren’t you?””No,” she replied.Langham, of Golford, close Cranbrook, Kent, denies 10 tallies of profane strike what’s more, two checks of buggery between January 1996 what’s more, April 2000.He too denies 15 checks of making an foul photo of a youngster between September what’s more, November 2005.

Actor Chris Langham was called a “father figure” by his charged casualty to maintain a strategic distance from doubt about their sexual relationship, a court heard today.
The charged casualty told a psychotherapist in 1998 that Langham was a “father figure” to her, Maidstone Crown Court heard.
She moreover alluded to him as a “saint” what’s more, told specialists she felt Langham “loved, respected, minded what’s more, appreciated” her.
The 25-year-old woman, who can’t be recognized for lawful reasons, said: “People utilized to say to me ‘I wager you’re resting with Chris Langham’ so I utilized to cover it up what’s more, say ‘no, that would be like resting with your dad’.”
The lady met the 58-year-old award-winning on-screen character at the point when he was showing up in Les Miserables in the West End of London.
She has asserted he took her virginity at the point when she was 14 in a London inn room what’s more, they had sex in his theater dressing room, his auto what’s more, his home over a period of a few years.
Defence advise David Whitehouse QC said: “Can I recommend that the genuine reason you didn’t tell the psychotherapist what’s more, therapist about the relationship with Chris Langham was since there was no sexual relationship with Chris Langham?”
She replied: “Mr Langham what’s more, I both know what happened. He is completely mindful that there was a relationship, sexual, while I was at school so no, you are wrong.”
The lady concurred she told a specialist she had sex with Langham at the point when she was 16 – what’s more, over the lawful age of assent – in arrange to ensure him what’s more, to stop her mother finding out.
“She would have halted it,” she said.
And she concurred with Mr Whitehouse that she told a specialist about five “sexually-charged incidents” including her stepfather, at three of which she blamed her mother of being present.
Langham was “saddened” what’s more, empowered her to look for offer assistance at the point when she told him, she said.
Mr Whitehouse said: “During the period at the point when you were making assertions against Chris Langham, you were making charges against the man your mother still loved. Can you see that totally undermines your clarification for not telling your mother?”
The lady replied: “No it doesn’t. It’s extraordinary since at that organize of my relationship with my mother, we didn’t have a close relationship so I had nothing to lose. However, with Mr Langham, on the off chance that mum or, then again people… had found out about our relationship, I would have lost something extraordinary that was critical to me.”
She too reviewed a sex session in a inn washroom being hindered at the point when a more clean entered the room.
Referring to buggery allegations, she said: “I’m about 90 per penny beyond any doubt that that happened while I was still at school. The time I saw him most, at the time we had the most sexual contact, was while I was at school.”
Mr Whitehouse said: “I’m going to recommend you are a fantasist. You’re not just a screwed-up fan, you are a fantasist, aren’t you?”
“No,” she replied.
Langham, of Golford, close Cranbrook, Kent, denies 10 checks of disgusting ambush what’s more, two tallies of buggery between January 1996 what’s more, April 2000.
He moreover denies 15 tallies of making an disgusting photo of a youngster between September what’s more, November 2005.
Sorry we are not as of now tolerating remarks on this article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *